Bros before hoe’s in masculinity Essay

Although in that location atomic number 18 some work force that break the mold, the majority of hands will never fully back up wowork forces cope withity. This is non because most custody argon pigs looking at to debase wo manpower, it is because of the concept of the paradox of mens index finger. custody as a social throng are powerful and yet so galore(postnominal) men belief weak, especially in relationships with women. Women controlm to save the power to put a leash on men. M either men spot in control when they redeem the set up of their fraternity of brothers.Most men are not willing to let their brothers down by turnout with pro-feminists. Siding with pro-feminists, as a male, could be seen as trying to news leak from the box that is hegemonic masculinity. There has been a destabilization of hegemonic masculinity with the movement of gracious rights congregations, namely the womens rights movement. There are galore(postnominal) arguments in party e levate of compare amongst men and women. In the past women were seen as the homemakers, that there was no need to educate them and there was clearly no place in the workforce for their sex.The time when girls needed no education, because all they had to do was to cut off one of a troop of suitors, marry him, keep house for him, and move on his wages, is gone forever, for the very simple reason that no char can consistently live on a mans wages any much (Kimmel and Mosmiller, 1992 178-179). Early in this nations history, men were viewed as the breadwinners it was very seldom that one would see a muliebrity in the study.As the years flummox progressed however, there has been a steady shake up towards a society where reasonable as many women are on the job(p) as men. It has also become much than common to see flummox at home dads. By 1999, the partage of women in the workforce was nearly sixty percent and men had fallen to about s eventidety-five percent according to th e International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of Americas (UAW) website. R.W. Connell states that there are many reasons why equality in the body of work would benefit men in his article Change among the Gatekeepers.For instance, very lifesize numbers of men are fathers, and about half of their children are girls (Connell, 2005 617). men with daughters will clearly want their children to succeed and grow the same opportunities as other children, regardless of gender. Connell also states that the role of breadwinner is a burden that many men feel compelled to fill. Over the years this has led to health concerns as a publication of stress and work relatedillness and injury.With more women in the body of work the number of men with these capers should signifi lingoly decrease. Recently there has been a surge of women in the political realm. Hillary Clinton running for president and Sarah Palin organism picked, by a man, to be his vice pre sidential running colleague shows that times have changed immensely. If a womanhood were to run for a rank such as this early in Americas history, she would have been laughed at. The mentation of a female president windlessness is not whole accepted by everyone, further Clinton did have her share of male supporters.Connell states that men would be subject to less violence if more women were in the workplace and if they held high power positions such as governor and president (Connell, 2005 615). large number in high power positions are very much tar thwarted for acts of violence, for instance buttocks F. Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln, and Robert Kennedy, just to name a few. It is not often that one turns on the news to hear of a female being assassinated. Mens violence towards women will also be decreased(Kimmel and Mosmiller, 1992). Many pro-feminist men have embraced a feminist analysis male violence against women, particularly barrage and rape (Kimmel and Mosmiller, 1992 37 1).The idea is that if equality is reached in society, men and women will have more meaningful relationships thus increasing understanding of one other and decreasing hostility and aggression.In our society, caring (for children, sick people, the elderly etc.) is viewed as a womans business. The art of caring appears virtually as a natural condition of being a woman Being a woman means being good at caring for people. However, in many parts of the world, we are seeing more men carrying out tasks associated with child care, either inside the home or in institutions (Lyra, 2004 3). Although many believe that women should have equal rights, there is still a sense that a womans place is in the household.These beliefs have been proliferated for centuries from the establishment of the United States. In the beginning this was how society was organized, a somewhat caste-like system. Now there has been a shift, but the ideas still remain. For recitation when Hillary Clinton ran for presid ent if these issues did not still exist then the fact that she is a woman would never have been as big a lecture point as it proved to be. Many men and women for that matter refused to support her simply because she was in facta female running for president.The problem with universal equality is that one group will always be looking for an advantage over another group. An essential question for any pro-feminist man must be whether or not it is possible for men to act against their own collective material interests(Douglas, 1994 33). As Michael Kaufman states in his idea of the paradox of mens power, men as a group are powerful. For as long as this country has been in existence, men have had the certain privileges over women. This whitethorn not seem amusement park and to be honest it isnt, but it would be interesting to turn the tables and see how women would act then.Would they be as fiercely in favor of equal rights, or would they do as many men do and just leave the system alon e? This is a clear question that could substantially cross the mind of any male pondering gender equality. The help is not so cut and dry, this is why it will be difficult, even after many years, to get all men on dining table with the womens rights movement.The pro-feminist mens movement starts from the acknowledgement that men have power and privilege in a male-dominated society (Kaufman, 1994 156). This idea is a problem for many men, so much so that there are even Mens rights activists. Not all men are willing to admit that males have an advantage over women in society. Mens rights activists promote perceived mens oppression, including selective good registration, unfair legal decrees of alimony and child support, and domestic violence against men (Fox, 2004 104).A common argument that Ive heard is that women are looking for equal rights, but everyone on that side of the fence seems to be perfectly content with only allowing men to be drafted for wars. I dont wish to sound like a hostile sexist because I am most definitely in favor of womens rights, I just dont see it as a worldly concern for any time in the near future.The fact of the matter is that you cant have it both ways. In order for full equality, the feminists need to mob the good with the bad, otherwise it is not equality that feminists are looking for, but instead to gain the speeding hand on men. I feel that many men recognize this fact and it is for this reason they shy apart from supporting the feminist movement.Most of this issue lies on the idea of equality in the workplace. Let the ablest of the sex be called to the lecture room, to the temperance rostrum, and whenever a post office falls vacant and a deserving woman is competent to fill and willingly take it, let her be name (Greely, 1852 167). If I am the candidate for a job and I am up against a woman, I am not going to tincture aside and say you take this position because women have been oppressed for preferably some time. I, like Horace Greely, believe that the most qualified person should get the job.I know that Ive seen many women, who are clearly in favor of equal treatment, bat their eyelashes, show some cleavage, and dally with patrol officers to get out of a ticket. The same thing occurs in the workplace with interviews, some women will cast aside their beliefs in order to flirt their way into a job. As an on-looking male, I must make note that these women are compete on the very stereotypes that they seek to eliminate. This makes it even more difficult for men to take up the argue for pro-feminism if women cannot take their fight seriously, how can men be expected to join?Most men are all for women fighting for equality and many will not be completely opposed to those men who do use up to fight on the pro-feminist side. There is a sense that these men are leaving the brotherhood. Some might say that it is almost an oxymoron to be a pro-feminist man. If a complete level of equality among genders were to be reached, which I dont see anytime in the near future, it would be as a result of the lowering of mens rights in order to level the playing field. Many men hold this view and this is why men who choose to fight for women can be viewed as traitors in a sense. A lot of men can feel constricted by women who often use tools like sex to get what they want.It is in these times that men usually turn to their brothers in arms to loosen the collar that women natter as a means of control. As bad as it may sound, a lot of men will be in favor of womens rights, but do nothing about it. Honestly what group with power is looking to relinquish their supremacy? The way society progresses is by dint of competition. Most people, men and women alike, will always be looking for the upper hand. It is for this reason that full equality among genders is not a realistic goal. take in as multi-pages