Red Badge of Courage Essay

The central thrust of the Red Badge of fearlessness is directed towards the puncturing of henry Flemings youthful range of illusions. Our inescap sufficient certainty concerning Red Badge of Courage is that Fleming is as deluded as the novel ends as he is when he first joins the Union Forces. Which of the above assessments of the development of hydrogen Flemings character do you feel comes closest to the truth? In your answer you should Consider the arguments for and against accepting the questions assertionsBring to book cheatledge of external critical opinion on the issue aroma at contextual aspects of the novel in relation to the topic infra consideration. ANSWER I feel that both(prenominal) these arguments show strong opinions and though both show a critical view of heat content Fleming, they atomic number 18 opposing views. The first mastery probems to come closest to the truth in that the vote counter lend unmatchableselfs irony to mock and deride Henry even at the same date he feels a certain affinity with him withal. pedagogy two is a conclusion moreover not inescapable as Henry, although belt up deluded, is not as deluded as he was at the time he joined the Union Army. In choosing statement one to be the truer of the two I birth come to the conclusion that the fibber is organism used as a figure who mocks Henrys self- impressiveness and self deception on one hand then shows reason on the other. Stephen exsert uses the narrator to tell the fib from a threesome party point of view and therefore shadow use this to wedge his points across.This use of third parties belies Cranes own experiences of death and mutilation both in his private sprightliness with the death of his siblings and in the stories, pictures and photographs he has seen whilst researching the book. It is possible, Stephen Crane had read General Ulysses S Grants memoirs and also Battles and leading of the civic War, which was a very popular and factual abs tract of four books at the time and he no doubt see Mathew B Bradys photographs of the Civil War in these also.The novel is a naturalistic human- interest story but Crane uses the experiences of ordinary soldiers who fought during the Civil War to get the feel of how young men were forever changed by their experiences. Crane cleverly uses contrasts to show how Henry feels at differing times, using demon images to show how active an imagination Henry has, for example to describe a column of men, two serpents crawling from the cavern of night.Crane also uses nature and colour to show contrasts, with constant references to how the sky looks and the fact that fetch Nature still goes on regardless of anything that puny men can do to themselves, for example a river, amber tinted in the shadow of its banks, purled at the armys feet, and at night, when the stream had beat of a mourning(prenominal) blackness, one could see across it the red, eye- desire gleam of hostile campfires Phra ses equal A fair field holding life. It would die if its timid eyes were compelled to see blood and He conceived nature to be a woman with a deep aversion to tragedy every(prenominal) show Henrys wonderment at the fact that nature can carry on contempt what happens, and at times the narrator sometimes unfairly mocks Henry for this. As the story develops and we see how Henry deals with the harsh realities of war the use of symbols becomes more developed, with Henry seeing the darker sides to war and death.This is when, I feel, the narrator becomes human to Henry as he tries to reconcile himself with the terrible things he has seen and done. The narrator give the most sympathy to Henry when he gets lost in the woods and finds a dead man, horror-stricken by the sight of a thing and again when he meets up with Jim Conklin and watches as he dies. paradoxically he mocks when Henrys thoughts turn to death and the hope that he would be understood in the afterlife.When Henry celebrates v ictory too shortly and then runs away and when Henry leaves the tattered man to die despite staying with Jim whilst he died. After Henry grants to his own camp and Wilson tends his wound he gets very defensive if anyone mentions his absence or his wound, to the point of him thinking of blackmailing Wilson with the return of his letters and the narrator here shows how Henry is feeling superior yet benevolent, thinking himself the better for not being able to conjure up a scathing remark and how his self justification makes him pompous, devious and condescending.Henrys illusions be punctured again when after bravely fighting, he hears the veterans laughing at him, which only provokes him to further prove his own worth on the involvementfield. His wisdom of the battle is now coloured by the brotherhood of battle. The second claim, is scathe in that Henry is not as deluded as he was, he has fought his demons and come out on the other side, not perfect, but able to realise that he has done dreadful things and he go forth have to live with them.Crane uses this discovery of self to great aplomb as he makes Henry question himself in the final chapter. Henry has a totally selfish and biased view of the world at the start, which slow unravels as the story goes on. Crane uses the narrator to give us an brain wave into Henrys mind by verbalising his thoughts and giving the narrators view of his actions. This in turn helps us to see the turmoil that Henry faces both deep down fighting the war and within himself. He turns out to despise his proto(prenominal) blusterings and convinces himself that he has matured fully.Although this is not true, he has matured to some intent by being able to see the flaws in his character. Henry still romanticises himself and his surroundings but his personal battle between his consious fear and his propensity to become a hero has been won. When Henry joined up he believed that he would become a great hero and that he would get ahead great battles, he of course had never even seen a battle except those that went on in his head. He boasts and brags, to himself, about how brave he is going to be yet he turns and runs once the realities of the fighting become apparent.Through his experiences he slowly comes to terms with the fact that war is blooming(a) and cruel And when his friend shows weakness he stores the information to use at a later date something he later cannot do. To justify all that he has done he thinks it had been necessary for him to swallow swords that he force have a better throat for grapes. Fate had, in truth been kind to him. And to justify leaving the tattered man he exclaimed that its importance in the aftertime would be great to him if it even succeeded in hindering the whole caboodle of his egotism. Critics of Stephen Crane have both blasted this story as give off rubbish and Cranes usage of the third party narrator as him trying to write a biography. General McClurg, when this book was promulgated blasted it as blatant lies. His soldiers would never act like that in such a base manner. McClurg himself fought in the Civil War but being a general was not of course in the cause lines of the battle. Many of the men who were, swore that they had fought with Stephen Crane even though he was not born until after the Civil War had ended. Such was the reality of the story to those quite a little.The people who thought that this story was an analogy for Stephen Cranes life based this assumption on these claims, so therefore, Stephen Crane must know of the battle mindset. Personally I think that Crane had heard so numerous stories of the war he could picture himself there and could imagine how a young boy would feel going through these experiences. Rather like modern stories penned by writers for television and films. I believe that Crane has shown himself to be a psychological realist in writing this piece and that each commentator takes from it what they want in relation to their own experiences and knowledge.Perhaps this was a biographic piece and Crane used Henry to show his own delusions. On discussion of this piece, both within a classroom setting and using discussion groups on computer, I have read and heard many differing views of Henry. These views vary depending on the critics age. Many young people see him as egotistical, judgemental and self absorbed whilst mature students see him as just like most teenagers, too young to be able to see the big picture.Henry may be deluded but like most people once maturity sets in delusions become diminish as experience is gained. In conclusion I feel that statement 1 is true because the story develops many internal storylines one of which is the puncturing of Henry Flemings youthful range of illusions, of which he has many. Statement 2 on the other hand seems true because Henry is deluded to a certain extent. This is one definite statement with no real detail behind it, the seed of it seem s to be assuming that Henry can not or will not change.