Historical Overview of Us Govt’s Role in Long Term Healthcare

A Case Study why Il juristic Immigration Is an Intergovern psychical Mess and Will Remain So Debra milksop April 22, 2012 PMG 300 Critical Thinking Introduction Along with religion and taxes, do non bring up extralegal immigration at a dinner party unless you compliments heated discussions and grand exits along with dull strained relationships. A discussion on illegal immigration petabits to untouch able-bodied responses and strong emotions no matter what political party affiliation. T here(predicate) ar those that blessed the Feds for not guarding the borders well enough. And whence there be others that blame the Feds for not defending the rights of entirely citizens.There argon those that blame state and topical anaesthetic governments for spending on operate for Illegals that should be spent on very citizens. And hence there argon others that blame state and local governments for not taking better c be of ALL of their citizens legal or illegal. term there be othe rs who point the finger in anger at everyone who outrages the right and consider illegal immigration is just that illegal. And yet others perk up America as a nation of immigrants and we should open our borders and welcome all in with open arms to citizenship no matter how they got here.There is no affection background it is legal or illegal, right or wrong. People want something done by their government but what is the right direction for illegal immigration? I. Why fool state and local governments become more than active in regulating illegal immigrants during recent years? Our textual matter refers to illegal immigration as the mother of all unfunded mandates. erst the immigrants cross the borders, (that the States believe are not being controlled adequately by the national governing), they fall under the jurisdiction of State and topical anesthetic governments.State, County, and urban center Governments, as well as School Districts, bear the financial brunt of pro viding serve for the immigrants in an economy that has go being cut for citizens. Schools are providing educations to children in the country illegally at a time that School Districts are already cutting budgets to be able to meet the takes to legal students. County Hospitals that are already underfunded to provide indigent and uninsured care for citizens are also providing health services for the immigrants. local anaesthetic Law Enforcement and City and County jails deal with those immigrants that break the law and are having to absorb those costs until they can be hand off to Federal Immigration services for deportation. State and local governments yield been handed the problem of illegal immigrants by the Federal government. The Feds are not funding the services that have to be provided to these mint and yet Government either elected official or civil servant is doing null to alter enforcement of the laws to remove those that are here illegally or to strengthen the bor ders and immigration process to keep illegal immigrants out.For the financial survival of umteen a(prenominal) of our Border States either illegal immigrants are breaking the law and need to leave the country or the laws need to be changed. This schizophrenic military strength towards immigration law enforcement has to stop either the law has been broken or it has not and appropriate action needs to be taken. Either people are breaking the law and should be deported or they should be offered citizenship or the legal ability to squelch. The States and Local Governments cannot afford to support illegal immigrant services and still take care of their own citizens.II. How does the design of American federalism lead to the types of intergovernmental conflicts found in the area of immigration? The Federal Government is amenable for Ports of Entry, Customs regulation, and Border Security. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, there were 11 million illegal immigrants living in the Uni ted States in 2007. If that many people are able to live in the United States illegally, the Federal Government has failed in its obligations to protect the borders and enforce immigration laws.The argument then continues that if the Federal Government is unable to meet their obligations of protection of the borders and enforcement of legal naturalization, then there should be no Federal Mandate to the State and Local governments without funding to support it. Or if there is no funding and the States and Local governments have to then fund these services, States Rights and Local Government Rights should prevail on the decisions as to what services should or should not be offered. If the State or Local governments do not want to provide education or medical services to illegal immigrants then they should not have to do so.The Federal Government has a history of unfunded mandates to the States and County government. One theoretical account was in the 1970s with changes to Mental Heal th laws and providing of treatment services. one time it was set in the courts that people could not be kept in mental hospitals if they were no danger to anyone else, and that they should be free to live their lives outside of institutions, the responsibleness was shifted to the Community Mental Health service exemplification. In this model, poor mentally ill people were to be treated in county outpatient clinics.Except like services for illegal immigrants, adequate funding was not provided to the States or to the Counties to support the model and now many poor mentally ill people are in jail or are homeless and not receiving any treatment. Conclusion Illegal immigration will continue to be an ablaze and heated topic no matter how it is resolved. Immigration deals with people and their lives. Once you put a face and name of someone you know as an illegal immigrant it is unvoiced to be black and white about the law and enforcement of that law.I have friends whose parents are il legally in the country from Ireland and have been here for years. Granny and Pa just came for a visit and never went home. plain after the focuson lapsed visas after 9/11 they are still here. And if they were to admit they outstayed their visa they would not be able to get back in the country. They are not hurting anyone and are being supported by their adult children and assist the family by providing childcare for the grandchildren. They pay for any services they use. But they are breaking the law. It is hard to think of these sweet old people being deported in handcuffs.I have sat with them for tea and eaten Grannys shortbread. But they are breaking the law and are no different from the Hispanic lady desperately trying to stay here long enough to give birth to an Anchor sister that will be born with citizenship and allow her to stay in the States. (That comparable Anchor Baby that gets brought up over and over again on Conservative Talk Radio. ) How do I defend Granny and P as view and not also defend the lady with her anchor baby? desire those heated dinner party discussions there is no middle ground when it comes to illegal immigration.